Ecotourism

Ecotourism


Ecotourism is a form of tourism involving
visiting fragile, pristine, and relatively undisturbed natural areas, intended as a low-impact
and often small scale alternative to standard commercial tourism. Its purpose may be to
educate the traveler, to provide funds for ecological conservation, to directly benefit
the economic development and political empowerment of local communities, or to foster respect
for different cultures and for human rights. Since the 1980s ecotourism has been considered
a critical endeavor by environmentalists, so that future generations may experience
destinations relatively untouched by human intervention. Several university programs
use this description as the working definition of ecotourism.
Generally, ecotourism deals with living parts of the natural environments. Ecotourism focuses
on socially responsible travel, personal growth, and environmental sustainability. Ecotourism
typically involves travel to destinations where flora, fauna, and cultural heritage
are the primary attractions. Ecotourism is intended to offer tourists insight into the
impact of human beings on the environment, and to foster a greater appreciation of our
natural habitats. Responsible ecotourism programs include those
that minimize the negative aspects of conventional tourism on the environment and enhance the
cultural integrity of local people. Therefore, in addition to evaluating environmental and
cultural factors, an integral part of ecotourism is the promotion of recycling, energy efficiency,
water conservation, and creation of economic opportunities for local communities. For these
reasons, ecotourism often appeals to advocates of environmental and social responsibility.
The term ‘ecotourism’, like ‘sustainable tourism’, is considered by many to be an oxymoron. Tourism
in general depends upon and increases air transportation, contributing significantly
to greenhouse gas emissions from combustion placed high into the stratosphere where they
immediately contribute to the heat trapping phenomenon behind global warming and climate
change. Additionally, “the overall effect of sustainable tourism is negative, where,
like ecotourism, philanthropic aspirations mask hard-nosed immediate self-interest.” Criteria
Ecotourism is a form of tourism that involves visiting natural areas—in the remote wilderness
or rural environments. According to the definition and principles of ecotourism established by
The International Ecotourism Society in 1990, ecotourism is “Responsible travel to natural
areas that conserves the environment and improves the well-being of local people.”. Martha Honey,
expands on the TIES definition by describing the seven characteristics of ecotourism, which
are: Involves travel to natural destinations
Minimizes impact Builds environmental awareness
Provides direct financial benefits for conservation Provides financial benefits and empowerment
for local people Respects local culture
Supports human rights and democratic movements such as:
conservation of biological diversity and cultural diversity through ecosystem protection
promotion of sustainable use of biodiversity, by providing jobs to local populations
sharing of socio-economic benefits with local communities and indigenous peoples by having
their informed consent and participation in the management of ecotourism enterprises
tourism to unspoiled natural resources, with minimal impact on the environment being a
primary concern. minimization of tourism’s own environmental
impact affordability and lack of waste in the form
of luxury local culture, flora and fauna being the main
attractions local people benefit from this form of tourism
economically, often more than mass tourism Ecotourism Society Pakistan explains “Ecotourism
is a travel activity that ensures direct financial support to local people where tourism activities
are being generated and enjoyed. It teaches travellers to respect local cultures of destinations
where travellers are visiting. It supports small stakeholders to ensure that money must
not go out from the local economies. It discourage mass tourism, mass constructions of hotels,
tourism resorts and mass activities in fragile areas”. For many countries, ecotourism is
not simply a marginal activity to finance protection of the environment, but is a major
industry of the national economy. For example, in Costa Rica, Ecuador, Nepal, Kenya, Madagascar
and territories such as Antarctica, ecotourism represents a significant portion of the gross
domestic product and economic activity. Ecotourism is often misinterpreted as any
form of tourism that involves nature. In reality, the latter activities often consist of placing
a hotel in a splendid landscape, to the detriment of the ecosystem. According to them ecotourism
must above all sensitize people to the beauty and the fragility of nature. They condemn
some operators as greenwashing their operations: using the labels of “green” and “eco-friendly”,
while behaving in environmentally irresponsible ways.
Although academics disagree about who can be classified as an ecotourist and there is
little statistical data, some estimate that more than five million ecotourists—the majority
of the ecotourist population—come from the United States, with many others from Western
Europe, Canada and Australia. Currently, there are various moves to create
national and international ecotourism accreditation programs, although the process is also controversial.
National ecotourism certification programs have been put in place in countries such as
Costa Rica, Australia, Kenya, Estonia, and Sweden.
Terminology and history Ecotourism is a late 20th-century neologism
compounded from eco- and tourism. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, ecotour
was first recorded in 1973 and ecotourism, “probably after ecotour”, in 1982.
ecotour, n. … A tour of or visit to an area of ecological interest, usually with an educational
element; a similar tour or visit designed to have as little detrimental effect on the
ecology as possible or undertaken with the specific aim of helping conservation efforts.
ecotourism, n. … Tourism to areas of ecological interest, esp. to support conservation efforts
and observe wildlife; spec. access to an endangered environment controlled so as to have the least
possible adverse effect. One source claims the terms were used earlier.
Claus-Dieter Hetzer, an academic and adventurer from Forum International in Berkeley, CA,
supposedly coined ecotourism in 1965 and ran the first ecotours in the Yucatán during
the early 1970s. Egotourism is a recent neologism, based upon
the pun between eco- and ego-, which pejoratively refers to travelers more motivated by an egotistical
desire to feel they engage in ethical tourism than by a genuine desire to support a local
ecology or sustainable development. Graham M. S. Dann, a University of the West Indies
sociology professor, published a groundbreaking 1977 study revealing that tourism motivation
is primarily based upon the socio-psychological concepts of anomie and ego-enhancement. Brian
Wheeller, a professor of tourism at the University of Tasmania, has popularized the academic
concept of egotourism. His brief 1992 “Eco or Ego tourism” article was the first published
usage of the coinage. Wheeller’s 1993 “Sustaining the Ego” article explained the concept. Sustainable tourism does provide the answer.
Unfortunately it is to the wrong question. Rather than effectively addressing the complexities
of tourism impact, what it is actually achieving is the considerably easier task of answering
the question – ‘How best can we cope with the criticism of tourism impact?’ – as opposed
to the impact itself. In essence then, the solution has been conjuring up an intellectually
appealing concept with little practical application. One that satisfies the immediate short-term
wishes of some of the main protagonists in tourism’s impact debate, avoids sacrifices
and enables behaviour in much the same way as before – but with the veneer of respectability
and from a higher moral platform. For eco-tourism, read ego-tourism. We are more concerned with
maintaining our status, massaging our own egos and appeasing our guilt than with addressing
the actual issues involved. Subsequent publications have elaborated upon
egotourism. Ecotourism, egotourism, responsible tourism,
jungle tourism, and sustainable tourism have become prevalent alternative tourism concepts
since the mid-1980s, and ecotourism has experienced arguably the fastest growth of all sub-sectors
in the tourism industry. The popularity represents a change in tourist perceptions, increased
environmental awareness, and a desire to explore natural environments.
Improving sustainability Regulation and accreditation
Because the regulation of ecotourism may be poorly implemented or nonexistent, ecologically
destructive greenwashed operations like underwater hotels, helicopter tours, and wildlife theme
parks can be categorized as ecotourism along with canoeing, camping, photography, and wildlife
observation. The failure to acknowledge responsible, low-impact ecotourism puts legitimate ecotourism
companies at a competitive disadvantage. Many environmentalists have argued for a global
standard of accreditation, differentiating ecotourism companies based on their level
of environmental commitment. A national or international regulatory board would enforce
accreditation procedures, with representation from various groups including governments,
hotels, tour operators, travel agents, guides, airlines, local authorities, conservation
organizations, and non-governmental organizations. The decisions of the board would be sanctioned
by governments, so that non-compliant companies would be legally required to disassociate
themselves from the use of the ecotourism brand.
Crinion suggests a Green Stars System, based on criteria including a management plan, benefit
for the local community, small group interaction, education value and staff training. Ecotourists
who consider their choices would be confident of a genuine ecotourism experience when they
see the higher star rating. In addition, environmental impact assessments
could be used as a form of accreditation. Feasibility is evaluated from a scientific
basis, and recommendations could be made to optimally plan infrastructure, set tourist
capacity, and manage the ecology. This form of accreditation is more sensitive to site
specific conditions. Some countries have their own certification
programs for ecotourism. Costa Rica, for example, runs the Certification of Sustainable Tourism
program, which is intended to balance the effect that business has on the local environment.
The CST program focuses on a company’s interaction with natural and cultural resources, the improvement
of quality of life within local communities, and the economic contribution to other programs
of national development. CST uses a rating system that categorizes a company based upon
how sustainable its operations are. CST evaluates the interaction between the company and the
surrounding habitat; the management policies and operation systems within the company;
how the company encourages its clients to become an active contributor towards sustainable
policies; and the interaction between the company and local communities/the overall
population. Based upon these criteria, the company is evaluated for the strength of its
sustainability. The measurement index goes from 0 to 5, with 0 being the worst and 5
being the best. Guidelines and education
An environmental protection strategy must address the issue of ecotourists removed from
the cause-and-effect of their actions on the environment. More initiatives should be carried
out to improve their awareness, sensitize them to environmental issues, and care about
the places they visit. Tour guides are an obvious and direct medium
to communicate awareness. With the confidence of ecotourists and intimate knowledge of the
environment, they can actively discuss conservation issues. A tour guide training program in Costa
Rica’s Tortuguero National Park has helped mitigate negative environmental impacts by
providing information and regulating tourists on the parks’ beaches used by nesting endangered
sea turtles. Small scale, slow growth and local control
The underdevelopment theory of tourism describes a new form of imperialism by multinational
corporations that control ecotourism resources. These corporations finance and profit from
the development of large scale ecotourism that causes excessive environmental degradation,
loss of traditional culture and way of life, and exploitation of local labor. In Zimbabwe
and Nepal’s Annapurna region, where underdevelopment is taking place, more than 90 percent of ecotourism
revenues are expatriated to the parent countries, and less than 5 percent go into local communities.
The lack of sustainability highlights the need for small scale, slow growth, and locally
based ecotourism. Local peoples have a vested interest in the well being of their community,
and are therefore more accountable to environmental protection than multinational corporations.
The lack of control, westernization, adverse impacts to the environment, loss of culture
and traditions outweigh the benefits of establishing large scale ecotourism.
The increased contributions of communities to locally managed ecotourism create viable
economic opportunities, including high level management positions, and reduce environmental
issues associated with poverty and unemployment. Because the ecotourism experience is marketed
to a different lifestyle from large scale ecotourism, the development of facilities
and infrastructure does not need to conform to corporate Western tourism standards, and
can be much simpler and less expensive. There is a greater multiplier effect on the economy,
because local products, materials, and labor are used. Profits accrue locally and import
leakages are reduced. The Great Barrier Reef Park in Australia reported over half of a
billion dollars of indirect income in the area and added thousands of indirect jobs
between 2004 and 2005. However, even this form of tourism may require foreign investment
for promotion or start up. When such investments are required, it is crucial for communities
for find a company or non-governmental organization that reflects the philosophy of ecotourism;
sensitive to their concerns and willing to cooperate at the expense of profit. The basic
assumption of the multiplier effect is that the economy starts off with unused resources,
for example, that many workers are cyclically unemployed and much of industrial capacity
is sitting idle or incompletely utilized. By increasing demand in the economy it is
then possible to boost production. If the economy was already at full employment, with
only structural, frictional, or other supply-side types of unemployment, any attempt to boost
demand would only lead to inflation. For various laissez-faire schools of economics which embrace
Say’s Law and deny the possibility of Keynesian inefficiency and under-employment of resources,
therefore, the multiplier concept is irrelevant or wrong-headed.
As an example, consider the government increasing its expenditure on roads by $1 million, without
a corresponding increase in taxation. This sum would go to the road builders, who would
hire more workers and distribute the money as wages and profits. The households receiving
these incomes will save part of the money and spend the rest on consumer goods. These
expenditures in turn will generate more jobs, wages, and profits, and so on with the income
and spending circulating around the economy. The multiplier effect arises because of the
induced increases in consumer spending which occur due to the increased incomes — and
because of the feedback into increasing business revenues, jobs, and income again. This process
does not lead to an economic explosion not only because of the supply-side barriers at
potential output but because at each “round”, the increase in consumer spending is less
than the increase in consumer incomes. That is, the marginal propensity to consume is
less than one, so that each round some extra income goes into saving, leaking out of the
cumulative process. Each increase in spending is thus smaller than that of the previous
round, preventing an explosion. Efforts to preserve ecosystems at risk
Some of the world’s most exceptional biodiversity is located in the Galapagos Islands. These
islands were designated a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1979, then added to UNESCO’s List
of World Heritage in Danger in 2007. IGTOA is a non-profit dedicated to preserving this
unique living laboratory against the challenges of invasive species, human impact, and tourism.
For travelers who want to be mindful of the environment and the impact of tourism, it
is recommended to utilize an operator that is endorsed by a reputable ecotourism organization.
In the case of the Galapagos, IGTOA has a list of the world’s premiere Galapagos Islands
tour companies dedicated to the lasting protection and preservation of the destination. A few
of these include Adventure Life, EcoVentura, and SilverSea.
Natural resource management Natural resource management can be utilized
as a specialized tool for the development of ecotourism. There are several places throughout
the world where the amount of natural resources are abundant. But, with human encroachment
and habitats these resources are depleting. Without knowing the proper utilization of
certain resources they are destroyed and floral and faunal species are becoming extinct. Ecotourism
programmes can be introduced for the conservation of these resources. Several plans and proper
management programmes can be introduced so that these resources remain untouched. Several
organizations, NGO’s, scientists are working on this field.
Natural resources of hill areas like Kurseong in West Bengal are plenty in number with various
flora and fauna, but tourism for business purpose poised the situation. Researcher from
Jadavpur University presently are working in this area for the development of ecotourism
which can be utilized as a tool for natural resource management.
In Southeast Asia government and nongovernmental organisations are working together with academics
and industry operators to spread the economic benefits of tourism into the kampungs and
villages of the region. A recently formed alliance, the South-East Asian Tourism Organisation,
is bringing together these diverse players to allay resource management concerns.
A 2002 summit held in Quebec led to the 2008 Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria, a collaborative
effort between the UN Foundation and other advocacy groups. The criteria, which are voluntary,
involve the following standards: “effective sustainability planning, maximum social and
economic benefits for local communities, minimum negative impacts on cultural heritage, and
minimum negative impacts on the environment.” Criticism
Definition In the continuum of tourism activities that
stretch from conventional tourism to ecotourism proper, there has been a lot of contention
to the limit at which biodiversity preservation, local social-economic benefits, and environmental
impact can be considered “ecotourism”. For this reason, environmentalists, special interest
groups, and governments define ecotourism differently. Environmental organizations have
generally insisted that ecotourism is nature-based, sustainably managed, conservation supporting,
and environmentally educated. The tourist industry and governments, however, focus more
on the product aspect, treating ecotourism as equivalent to any sort of tourism based
in nature. As a further complication, many terms are used under the rubric of ecotourism.
Nature tourism, low impact tourism, green tourism, bio-tourism, ecologically responsible
tourism, and others have been used in literature and marketing, although they are not necessary
synonymous with ecotourism. The problems associated with defining ecotourism
have often led to confusion among tourists and academics . Definitional problems are
also subject of considerable public controversy and concern because of green washing, a trend
towards the commercialization of tourism schemes disguised as sustainable, nature based, and
environmentally friendly ecotourism. According to McLaren, these schemes are environmentally
destructive, economically exploitative, and culturally insensitive at its worst. They
are also morally disconcerting because they mislead tourists and manipulate their concerns
for the environment. The development and success of such large scale, energy intensive, and
ecologically unsustainable schemes are a testament to the tremendous profits associated with
being labeled as ecotourism. Negative impact
Ecotourism has become one of the fastest-growing sectors of the tourism industry, growing annually
by 10–15% worldwide. One definition of ecotourism is “the practice of low-impact, educational,
ecologically and culturally sensitive travel that benefits local communities and host countries”.
Many of the ecotourism projects are not meeting these standards. Even if some of the guidelines
are being executed, the local communities are still facing other negative impacts. South
Africa is one of the countries that are reaping significant economic benefits from ecotourism,
but negative effects—including forcing people to leave their homes, gross violations of
fundamental rights, and environmental hazards—far outweigh the medium-term economic benefits.
A tremendous amount of money is being spent and human resources continue to be used for
ecotourism despite unsuccessful outcomes, and even more money is put into public relation
campaigns to dilute the effects of criticism. Ecotourism channels resources away from other
projects that could contribute more sustainable and realistic solutions to pressing social
and environmental problems. “The money tourism can generate often ties parks and managements
to eco-tourism”. But there is a tension in this relationship because ecotourism often
causes conflict and changes in land-use rights, fails to deliver promises of community-level
benefits, damages environments, and has plenty of other social impacts. Indeed many argue
repeatedly that ecotourism is neither ecologically nor socially beneficial, yet it persists as
a strategy for conservation and development. While several studies are being done on ways
to improve the ecotourism structure, some argue that these examples provide rationale
for stopping it altogether. The ecotourism system exercises tremendous
financial and political influence. The evidence above shows that a strong case exists for
restraining such activities in certain locations. Funding could be used for field studies aimed
at finding alternative solutions to tourism and the diverse problems Africa faces in result
of urbanization, industrialization, and the over exploitation of agriculture. At the local
level, ecotourism has become a source of conflict over control of land, resources, and tourism
profits. In this case, ecotourism has harmed the environment and local people, and has
led to conflicts over profit distribution. In a perfect world more efforts would be made
towards educating tourists of the environmental and social effects of their travels. Very
few regulations or laws stand in place as boundaries for the investors in ecotourism.
These should be implemented to prohibit the promotion of unsustainable ecotourism projects
and materials which project false images of destinations, demeaning local and indigenous
cultures. Though conservation efforts in East Africa
are indisputably serving the interests of tourism in the region it is important to make
the distinction between conservation acts and the tourism industry. Eastern African
communities are not the only of developing regions to experience economic and social
harms from conservation efforts. Conservation in the Northwest Yunnan Region of China has
similarly brought drastic changes to traditional land use in the region. Prior to logging restrictions
imposed by the Chinese Government the industry made up 80 percent of the regions revenue.
Following a complete ban on commercial logging the indigenous people of the Yunnan region
now see little opportunity for economic development. Ecotourism may provide solutions to the economic
hardships suffered from the loss of industry to conservation in the Yunnan in the same
way that it may serve to remedy the difficulties faced by the Maasai. As stated, the ecotourism
structure must be improved to direct more money into host communities by reducing leakages
for the industry to be successful in alleviating poverty in developing regions, but it provides
a promising opportunity. Direct environmental impacts
Ecotourism operations occasionally fail to live up to conservation ideals. It is sometimes
overlooked that ecotourism is a highly consumer-centered activity, and that environmental conservation
is a means to further economic growth. Although ecotourism is intended for small
groups, even a modest increase in population, however temporary, puts extra pressure on
the local environment and necessitates the development of additional infrastructure and
amenities. The construction of water treatment plants, sanitation facilities, and lodges
come with the exploitation of non-renewable energy sources and the utilization of already
limited local resources. The conversion of natural land to such tourist infrastructure
is implicated in deforestation and habitat deterioration of butterflies in Mexico and
squirrel monkeys in Costa Rica. In other cases, the environment suffers because local communities
are unable to meet the infrastructure demands of ecotourism. The lack of adequate sanitation
facilities in many East African parks results in the disposal of campsite sewage in rivers,
contaminating the wildlife, livestock, and people who draw drinking water from it.
Aside from environmental degradation with tourist infrastructure, population pressures
from ecotourism also leaves behind garbage and pollution associated with the Western
lifestyle. Although ecotourists claim to be educationally sophisticated and environmentally
concerned, they rarely understand the ecological consequences of their visits and how their
day-to-day activities append physical impacts on the environment. As one scientist observes,
they “rarely acknowledge how the meals they eat, the toilets they flush, the water they
drink, and so on, are all part of broader regional economic and ecological systems they
are helping to reconfigure with their very activities.” Nor do ecotourists recognize
the great consumption of non-renewable energy required to arrive at their destination, which
is typically more remote than conventional tourism destinations. For instance, an exotic
journey to a place 10,000 kilometers away consumes about 700 liters of fuel per person.
Ecotourism activities are, in and of themselves, issues in environmental impact because they
may disturb fauna and flora. Ecotourists believe that because they are only taking pictures
and leaving footprints, they keep ecotourism sites pristine, but even harmless-sounding
activities such as nature hikes can be ecologically destructive. In the Annapurna Circuit in Nepal,
ecotourists have worn down the marked trails and created alternate routes, contributing
to soil impaction, erosion, and plant damage. Where the ecotourism activity involves wildlife
viewing, it can scare away animals, disrupt their feeding and nesting sites, or acclimate
them to the presence of people. In Kenya, wildlife-observer disruption drives cheetahs
off their reserves, increasing the risk of inbreeding and further endangering the species.
Environmental hazards The industrialization, urbanization, and unsustainable
agriculture practices of human society are considered to be having a serious effect on
the environment. Ecotourism is now also considered to be playing a role in this depletion. While
the term ecotourism may sound relatively benign, one of its most serious impacts is its consumption
of virgin territories. These invasions often include deforestation, disruption of ecological
life systems and various forms of pollution, all of which contribute to environmental degradation.
The number of motor vehicles crossing the park increases as tour drivers search for
rare species. The number of roads has disrupted the grass cover which has serious effects
on plant and animal species. These areas also have a higher rate of disturbances and invasive
species because of all the traffic moving off the beaten path into new undiscovered
areas. Ecotourism also has an effect on species through the value placed on them. “Certain
species have gone from being little known or valued by local people to being highly
valued commodities. The commodification of plants may erase their social value and lead
to overproduction within protected areas. Local people and their images can also be
turned into commodities”. Kamuaro brings up a relatively obvious contradiction, any commercial
venture into unspoiled, pristine land with or without the “eco” prefix as a contradiction
in terms. To generate revenue you have to have a high number of traffic, tourists, which
inevitably means a higher pressure on the environment.
Local people Most forms of ecotourism are owned by foreign
investors and corporations that provide few benefits to local communities. An overwhelming
majority of profits are put into the pockets of investors instead of reinvestment into
the local economy or environmental protection. The limited numbers of local people who are
employed in the economy enter at its lowest level, and are unable to live in tourist areas
because of meager wages and a two market system. In some cases, the resentment by local people
results in environmental degradation. As a highly publicized case, the Maasai nomads
in Kenya killed wildlife in national parks but are now helping the national park to save
the wildlife to show aversion to unfair compensation terms and displacement from traditional lands.
The lack of economic opportunities for local people also constrains them to degrade the
environment as a means of sustenance. The presence of affluent ecotourists encourage
the development of destructive markets in wildlife souvenirs, such as the sale of coral
trinkets on tropical islands and animal products in Asia, contributing to illegal harvesting
and poaching from the environment. In Suriname, sea turtle reserves use a very large portion
of their budget to guard against these destructive activities.
Displacement of people One of the most powerful examples of communities
being moved in order to create a park is the story of the Maasai. About 70% of national
parks and game reserves in East Africa are on Maasai land. The first undesirable impact
of tourism was that of the extent of land lost from the Maasai culture. Local and national
governments took advantage of the Maasai’s ignorance on the situation and robbed them
of huge chunks of grazing land, putting to risk their only socio-economic livelihood.
In Kenya the Maasai also have not gained any economic benefits. Despite the loss of their
land, employment favours better educated workers. Furthermore the investors in this area are
not local and have not put profits back into local economy. In some cases game reserves
can be created without informing or consulting local people, who come to find out about the
situation when an eviction notice is delivered. Another source of resentment is the manipulation
of the local people by their government. “Eco-tourism works to create simplistic images of local
people and their uses and understandings of their surroundings. Through the lens of these
simplified images, officials direct policies and projects towards the local people and
the local people are blamed if the projects fail”. Clearly tourism as a trade is not empowering
the local people who make it rich and satisfying. Instead ecotourism exploits and depletes,
particularly in African Maasai tribes. It has to be reoriented if it is to be useful
to local communities and to become sustainable. Threats to indigenous cultures
Ecotourism often claims that it preserves and “enhances” local cultures. However, evidence
shows that with the establishment of protected areas local people have illegally lost their
homes, and most often with no compensation. Pushing people onto marginal lands with harsh
climates, poor soils, lack of water, and infested with livestock and disease does little to
enhance livelihoods even when a proportion of ecotourism profits are directed back into
the community. The establishment of parks can create harsh survival realities and deprive
the people of their traditional use of land and natural resources. Ethnic groups are increasingly
being seen as a “backdrop” to the scenery and wildlife. The local people struggle for
cultural survival and freedom of cultural expression while being “observed” by tourists.
Local indigenous people also have strong resentment towards the change, “Tourism has been allowed
to develop with virtually no controls. Too many lodges have been built, too much firewood
is being used and no limits are being placed on tourism vehicles. They regularly drive
off-track and harass the wildlife. Their vehicle tracks cris-cross the entire Masai Mara. Inevitably
the bush is becoming eroded and degraded”. Mismanagement
While governments are typically entrusted with the administration and enforcement of
environmental protection, they often lack the commitment or capability to manage ecotourism
sites effectively. The regulations for environmental protection may be vaguely defined, costly
to implement, hard to enforce, and uncertain in effectiveness. Government regulatory agencies,
as political bodies, are susceptible to making decisions that spend budget on politically
beneficial but environmentally unproductive projects. Because of prestige and conspicuousness,
the construction of an attractive visitor’s center at an ecotourism site may take precedence
over more pressing environmental concerns like acquiring habitat, protecting endemic
species, and removing invasive ones. Finally, influential groups can pressure and sway the
interests of the government to their favor. The government and its regulators can become
vested in the benefits of the ecotourism industry which they are supposed to regulate, causing
restrictive environmental regulations and enforcement to become more lenient.
Management of ecotourism sites by private ecotourism companies offers an alternative
to the cost of regulation and deficiency of government agencies. It is believed that these
companies have a self-interest in limited environmental degradation, because tourists
will pay more for pristine environments, which translates to higher profit. However, theory
indicates that this practice is not economically feasible and will fail to manage the environment.
The model of monopolistic competition states that distinctiveness will entail profits,
but profits will promote imitation. A company that protects its ecotourism sites is able
to charge a premium for the novel experience and pristine environment. But when other companies
view the success of this approach, they also enter the market with similar practices, increasing
competition and reducing demand. Eventually, the demand will be reduced until the economic
profit is zero. A cost-benefit analysis shows that the company bears the cost of environmental
protection without receiving the gains. Without economic incentive, the whole premise of self-interest
through environmental protection is quashed; instead, ecotourism companies will minimize
environment related expenses and maximize tourism demand.
The tragedy of the commons offers another model for economic unsustainability from environmental
protection, in ecotourism sites utilized by many companies. Although there is a communal
incentive to protect the environment, maximizing the benefits in the long run, a company will
conclude that it is in their best interest to utilize the ecotourism site beyond its
sustainable level. By increasing the number of ecotourists, for instance, a company gains
all the economic benefit while paying only a part of the environmental cost. In the same
way, a company recognizes that there is no incentive to actively protect the environment;
they bear all the costs, while the benefits are shared by all other companies. The result,
again, is mismanagement. Taken together, the mobility of foreign investment
and lack of economic incentive for environmental protection means that ecotourism companies
are disposed to establishing themselves in new sites once their existing one is sufficiently
degraded. Case Studies
The purpose of ecotourism is to engage tourists in low impact, non-consumptive and locally
oriented environments in order to maintain species and habitats – especially in underdeveloped
regions. While some ecotourism projects, including some found in the United States, can support
such claims, many projects have failed to address some of the fundamental issues that
nations face in the first place. Consequently, ecotourism may not generate the very benefits
it is intended to provide to these regions and their people, and in some cases leaving
economies in a state worse than before. The following case studies illustrate the
rising complexity of ecotourism and its impacts, both positive and negative, on the environment
and economies of various regions in the world. Ecotourism in Costa Rica
Ecotourism in South Africa Ecotourism in the United States
Ecotourism in Jordan See also References Further reading
Burger, J. 2000. Landscapes, tourism, and conservation. Science of the Total Environment.
249: 39–49. Ceballos-Lascurain, H. 1996. Tourism, Ecotourism,
and Protected Areas. Clarkin, T. and K. N. Kähler. 2011. “Ecotourism.”
Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues. Rev. ed. Pasadena: Salem Press. Vol. 2, pp. 421–424.
ISBN 978-1-58765-737-5 IUCN. The International Union for the Conservation
of Nature. 301 pp. Ceballos-Lascurain, H. 1998. Ecoturismo. Naturaleza
y Desarrollo Sostenible. Editorial Diana. 185 pp.
Duffy, R. 2000. Shadow players: ecotourism development, corruption and state politics
in Belize. Third world quarterly, 21(3): 549–565. Gutzwiller, K. J. y S. H. Anderson, 1999.
Spatial extent of human-intrusion effects on subalpine bird distributions. Condor 101:
378–389. Nowaczek, A. “Ecotourism: Principles and Practices”
Annals of Tourism Research 37.1:270–271. Orams, M. B. 2000, Tourist getting close to
whales, is it what whale watching is all about? Tourist Management, 21(6): 562–569.
Reguero Oxinalde, M. del. 1995. Ecoturismo. Nuevas formas de turismo en el espacio rural.
Ed. Bosch Turismo Scheyvens, R., 1999, Ecotourism and the empowerment
of local communities. Tourism management, 20: 245–249.
Weaver, D. B. 1998. Ecotourism in the less developed world. C.A.B. Int. Pbl. 288 pp.
[ISBN] Buckley, R.. “Tourism and Environment”. Annual
Review of Environment and Resources 36: 397–416. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-041210-132637. 
External links Ecotourism at DMOZ
The International Ecotourism Society NHTV Centre for Sustainable Tourism and Transport
Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *